【一包養網張瑞濤】論張立文師長教師宋明理學研討的邏輯進路

作者:

分類:

requestId:684c3e14603e38.91801281.

About the logical approach discussed by Zhang Liwen, chief teacher Song Ming’s Philosophy,

Author: Zhang Ruibing (Maxist School of Chinese Petroleum (Huadong))

Source: Author Author Authorized Confucian Network Published

                                  “Qizhou Literature and History Journal” Issue 1 in 2020

Time: Confucius was the second day of the third month of the Gengzi in 2570 Dingmao

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  href=”https://twsweetsugar99.org/”>Female College Students’ Care ClubSchool Teacher Zhang Liwen’s Song Ming Science Research Research, insists on problem awareness and humanistic concerns, compose classics, think clearly and distinguish, and abide by the following logic Going forward: Starting from the “Book of Changes”, one of the classical texts of the Neo-Chapter, Song and Ming dynasties, wrote “Book of Thoughts and Research on Zhou Yi”, laying the foundation for a comprehensive analysis of the philosophical thinking of Neo-Chapter of Song and Ming dynasties; taking Zhu Xi’s discussion as a preliminary trial of the Neo-Chapter of Song and Ming dynasties, the author of “Zhu Xi’s Thoughts and Research on the Neo-Chapter” became the “Year of Civilization Night Reaction” is a model work of studying Chinese philosophical history figures in the post-academic circle; focusing on Zhou Dunxi, Zhang Xu, Er Cheng, Zhu Xi, Yue Jiuqing, Wang Yangming and Wang Fuzhi, systematically assessing the “Song Ming Dynasty Research and Research” of Song and Ming Dynasty Neo-Confucianists’ Thought and Evolution, which led to the mainstream and non-mainstream relationship between Song and Ming Dynasty Neo-Confucianism , mainstream has three different systems, which understands the basic connotation and ideological characteristics of Song and Ming dynasties; because of the international conference, it was deduced by Zhu Zixue to the Korean Confucianism, and expanded it to the East Asian Confucianism Research, and clearly proposed the relationship between “East Asian Ideology” and its joint energy. Of course, whether it was a “case” discussion by famous scholars of Song and Ming Philosophy, or a “whole” discussion by Song and Ming Philosophy, they always abide by the “Chinese Philosophy, logical structure” discussion method. This method also forms the logical core of the philosophical paradigm of “speaking by oneself” and “speaking by oneself” advocated by him later.

 

Keywords: Zhang Liwen Song Ming Dynasty Logical entry

 

Chinese picture classification number: B244               Text code: A                Article number: 1000-8705 (2 020)01-08-19

 

 

Teacher Zhang Liwen, male, Han nationality, born on April 28, 1935, from Wenzhou City, Zhejiang Province, first-class professor, currently serves as a doctoral supervisor at the School of Philosophy of the National People’s School and the director of the Confucius Institute of the National People’s School. In 1956, he was admitted to the Chinese Philosophy History Department of the Chinese National People’s History Department. In 1960, he graduated from school and was assigned to the Chinese Philosophy History Teaching and Research Department of the Philosophy Department to teach, and was once the director of the teaching and research department. So far, Teacher Zhang has published more than 30 specialized in book science, edited and co-edited.He has written nearly forty works and published nearly 600 articles, especially the “harmony” system proposed and created by the last century at the end of the 1990s. He is famous both at home and abroad and is a famous philosopher historian and philosopher in contemporary China. Teacher Zhang Zhang’s Song Ming Philology Research Research, insisted on problem awareness and humanistic concern, collaborated on classics, thoughts and discernment, and was innovative and vivid, and followed this logical approach: “Miss Zhou sat back on the service station and started to use short videos, but didn’t know how to watch it. href=”https://twlovedating520.com/”>Break the marketWat Yi” Siwei Research and Research Progress, laying the foundation for the academic foundation of Song Mingli. The preliminary trial of the research and discussion; with the “Song Ming Dynasty Research and Study” as the theme, it logically discussed the connotation and division of the ideological content of Song Ming Dynasty; from the research and development of Li Tuixi, a scholar from Zhu Zi, from Korea, to the research and development of East Asia Confucianism, and advocated the “East Asia Ideology”; and used “Chinese Philosophical Logic Structure” as the basic research and discussion method of Song Ming Dynasty.

 

1. Using the study and discussion of the “Book of Changes” to lay the foundation for the academic foundation of the study of Song and Ming Philology

 

The study and development of the study and development of Song and Ming Philology at the “Book of Changes” is the end of the study and development of Song and Ming Philology at the research and development of even the innovation of academics. Teacher Zhang stayed at the school to conduct research on Song Ming’s science and technology research after graduating early in June 1960. At that time, the director of the Chinese Philosophy History Teaching and Research Department of the Department of the Chinese Philosophy of the Chinese National Philosophy was Mr. Shi Jun, and the branch secretary was Mr. Yin Ming. The two teachers asked Mr. Zhang to learn about the history of Chinese Philosophy and be able to talk about the general history of Chinese Philosophy. At the same time, according to the purpose of the staff discussion of the teaching and research department, Mr. Zhang asked Mr. Zhang to focus on studying the Song, Yuan, Ming and Qing dynasties. After 1949, the Chinese philosophical history community has always criticized the “new science” of friends. The Song, Yuan, Ming and Qing dynasties were almost a forbidden area of ​​Chinese philosophical history. Almost no young people dared to discuss it, but Zhang Shucheng’s teacher accepted it and opened up a new Liuhe studied by Song and Ming dynasties. [①] We must know that Song and Ming Neo-Confucianism is a top peak in the history of Chinese thinking, a new stage of the development of Chinese philosophy, and a concentrated manifestation of the integration of the theoretical thinking of the three schools of Confucianism and Taoism. Its original heart is a reverse movement against the learning of chapters and sentences since the Han Tang Dynasty, and a new Confucian rejuvenation movement under the “doubt change”. Some scholars pointed out that as the second period of Confucianism, the Song and Ming Neo-Confucianism should have an impact on the nature of Buddhism and Taoism, and to lay the foundation for the Confucian career method, it can further highlight the philosophical nature of thinking. [②] Therefore, modern Chinese philosophical historians have almost started to climb the stage since the Song and Ming dynasties. Therefore, Teacher Zhang clearly pointed out: “To summarize the modern Chinese philosophical thinking and look forward to the future development of Chinese philosophical thinking, the Song and Ming Philosophical Thought is a key.” [③] However, many Song and Ming Philosophical Thoughts have been studied and discussed, and described that the thoughts of the “Book of Changes” are a wide selection of Song and Ming Philosophical Thoughts, such as:Zhou Dunxi, the founder of the Song and Ming dynasties, wrote “Taifeng Diagrams” and “Tongshu” (i.e. “Yitong”). Zhang Xu, a representative figure of the Qi school, wrote “The Legend of the Confucian Yi”, wrote “The Legend of the Confucian Yi”, wrote “The Legend of the Confucian Yi”, Zhu Xi, wrote “The Book of Changes” and “The Book of Changes”. Although Wang Yangming, a master of the Heart Collection, did not have any special works on Yi, he realized the truth by reading the “Book of Changes”. Liu Zongzhou, the military officer of the Song and Ming dynasties, also wrote “The Book of Changes” and “The Book of Changes”.

Teacher Zhang once pointed out that the innovation of Chinese philosophy has “three analytical dimensions”, namely the direction of focus topics, the transformation of humanistic context, and the transformation of text: the focus topic has the meaning pursuit and value creation of a specific era. The humanistic context is the concentrated manifestation of the historical changes of the Chinese people’s energy and life and life. The speech text is the symbolic tracking of academic thinking and a text report of a clear understanding. [④] As the crystallization of the wisdom of the three religions of Confucianism and Taoism for a long time, theorists have widely used “Da”, “Meng”, “Science”, “Yong”, and “Yi” as the texts to realize the innovation of the philosophical system. Although Mr. Zhang proposed the innovative Chinese philosophy of later than the comprehensive discussion of the philosophical thinking of Song and Ming wise scholars, the


留言

發佈留言

發佈留言必須填寫的電子郵件地址不會公開。 必填欄位標示為 *